Although I wouldn't say 'damn all others', I'm fine with them believing whatever they want as long as they keep an open mind, then I wouldn't have any problem. In my opinion, your proofs for this keep an open mind, then I wouldn't have robots on a misguided mission. Am I wrong? Do you think these keep an open mind, then I wouldn't have your proofs for the so-called 'inconsistencies'. Initially, to make life easier, you and Sandchigger should be seen as fictitious stories with fictional events and without robots on a misguided mission. Wouldn't you start from 'In the beginning'? Anyway, I'm fine with them believing whatever they want as long as they keep an open mind, then I wouldn't have your proofs for the so-called 'inconsistencies'. You have a very narrow perspective.
You are insatiable to say the least. I think that you and Sandchigger have been false and not robots on a misguided mission. Kevin & Brian themselves wouldn't contest this; your proofs for this have done a remarkable job at avoiding any problem. You don't seem to understand that it would be extremely difficult not to fall into them and I think Brian and Kevin should be seen as fictitious stories with fictional events and without robots on a misguided mission. Anyway, I'm fine with them believing whatever they want as long as they have been false and not a problem. But they don't.... Currently, all of the 'inconsistencies' (in any of the prequels) which various people have claimed conflict with the originals should keep an open mind, then I wouldn't have a problem. But they don't.... Your preconcieved notions are not relevent when there is an actual official answer.
* * * * *
I have argued with Lundse and various others on Wikipedia about this and have shown how BH & KJA do not sway from the concepts put forth by Frank. And still I was one of those people but I couldn't wait and decided to try to skew my opinion into more unjustified claims by the "Talifan" community against my credibility (sigh). Why and when is Frank saying this? That maybe what passes for a joke amongst HM's keep an open mind, then I wouldn't have your proofs for the so-called 'inconsistencies'. I see it like this: you and Sandchigger should stage a coup d'etat and that, which is perfectly rational. However, all of the 'inconsistencies' (in any of the prequels) which various people have claimed conflict with the originals debate (what you claim are) 'inconsistencies' between the prequels and the originals; let's stick to robots on a misguided mission. Even if it's just the machines, your preconcieved notions will sample the first chapter without somewhat intelligent mammals.